Своєрідність формування релігійних значень за допомогою внутрішньослівного гіпонімійного зв’язку
2020, 8, No. 8
Чернівецький національний університет імені Юрія Федьковича
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 473 KB
Number of views:89
Number of downloads:24
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the specifi cs of the formation of religious meanings with the help of the intraword hyponymic (genus-species) relations. It was revealed t hat in semantic structures of lexemes, this type of semantic derivation is capable of actively deploying stable specialized religious(specifi c, hyponymic) meanings from commonly used (generic, hypernymic) ones. It was also found that in times of Christianization, the fi xation of hyponyms often led to the disappearance of hypernyms. The process of transferring religious hyponyms without hypernyms from other languages into the Old Kyiv language was quite active. Forming a paradigm through hyponymic relations refl ects a variety of changes in the represented reality associated with the linguistically conservative religious sphere of Ukrainians: the names remained unchanged, while language objects, acquiring new functions, changed, and the speakers’ knowledge of the objects deepened.
Keywords:
Bibliography
Alefіrenko N., Spornye problemy semantіkі, Moskva 2005.
Babaeva E., Sovremennaâ leksіkografi â o strukture mnogoznačnosti prilagatelnogo prostoj [v:] Âzykovaâ kartina mira i sistemnaâ leksikografi â, pod red. V. Apresân i dr., Moskva 2006, s. 761-844.
Dombrovs’kij V., Ukraїns’ka stilìstika ì ritmìka. Ukraїns’ka poetika, Drogobič 2008.
Dorošenko S., Zagal’ne movoznavstvo, Kiїv 2006.
Galâtovs’kij J., Nauka albo sposob zloženâ kazanâ, L`vìv 1665, http://litopys.org.ua/old17/old17_04.htm, [25.12.2018].
Hansen K., Englische Lexikologie. Einfuhrung in Wortbildung und lexikalische Semantik, Leipzig 1982.
Kislŭk L., Sučasna ukraїns’ka nomìnaсìâ: resursi ta tendencìї, Kiїv 2017.
Kobozeva I., Lingvističeskaâ semantika, Moskva 2000.
Konovalova E., Giper-giponimiâ v ekonomičeskoj terminologii [v:] „Filolohičeskie studiiˮ, 2, 2001, s. 79-85.
Krongauz M., Semantika, Moskva 2001.
Levickij V., Semasiologiâ, Vinnica 2006.
Nayenko G., Naukova metamova ,,Sinopsisuˮ: komunìkativno-pragmatičnì aspekti [v:] „Aktual’nì problemi ukraїns’koї lìngvìstiki: teorìâ ì praktikaˮ, gol. red. L. Ševčenko, Kiїv 2011, s. 79-90.
Nepijvoda F., Leksika aktovih knig Starodubs’kogo mìs’kogo urâdu drugoї polovini XVII stolìttâ [v:] Doslìdžennâ z movoznavstva, Kiїv 1962.
Nikitin M., Kurs lingvističeskoj semantiki, Sankt-Peterburg 1996.
Novikov L., Semantika russkogo âzyka, Moskva 1982.
Ogìênko Ì., Ukraїns’kа cerkva: narisi z ìstorìї Ukraїns’koї pravoslavnoї cerkvi, http://litopys.org.ua/ohienko/oh03.htm, [01.08.2018].
Osìnčuk Û., Ìstorìâ ukraїns’koї bogoslužbovo-obrâdovoї leksiki, Kiїv 2009.
Popova O., Osnovi termìnoznavstva, Rìvne 2011.
Purâêva N., Formuvannâ ukraїns’koї cerkovno-obrâdovoї termìnologìї (nazvi bogoslužbovih predmetìv): аvtoref. dis. kand. fìlol. nauk, Kiїv 2001.
Ukraїns’kа mova: enсiklopedìâ, redkol.: V. Rusanìvskij, O. Taranenko, M. Zâblŭk ta ìn., Kiїv 2004.
Vinogradov V., Osnovnye tipy leksičeskih značenij slova [v:] „Voprosy âzykoznaniâˮ, gl. red. V. Vinogradov, Moskva 1953, s. 3-29.
Žovtobrŭh M., Stilìstična diferencìacìâ ukraїns’koї leksiki. Sučasna ukraїns’ka lìteraturna mova: leksika ì frazeologìâ, Kiїv 1973.